The biggest thing is that I finally found a way to get highs in seminars.
I found out that points are easier to become highs when:
- The connect to other points
- They evaluate anything
- Comparisons.
First point is easy, but second is hard because it’s really hard to say:”I think …‘s point is good because…”
Instead what’s easier to say is, just add the evaluation after your point for example:
”…. I think my proposal is optimal because….”
or
”I agree with … his / her point is good because…”
But even better, you can make some evaluation that opens up discussion. For example:
” <insert point here>… I think my proposal is optimal because… but it might still have room for improvement as in … it still doesn’t fully address, his / her point can help my point because …”
or
”I agree with… <insert point on here> his / her point is good because… but it can still be improved as in … it still doesn’t fully, I think we can modify …, I think my proposal is good because …”
If in your evaluation, you also compared your point to other points, without just relying on absolute criteria, its going to be even more better(“its performs better than…” instead of “It performs well at…”)
