The ethics of GMOs, And how they impact the world

The Ethics of Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs)

Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) have become a major development in modern agriculture and biotechnology. These organisms, whose genetic material has been altered for specific benefits such as pest resistance or improved nutritional value, offer potential solutions to problems like food insecurity and climate change. However, their use has also raised significant ethical concerns about human health, environmental impacts, economic equity, and cultural integrity. This essay explores the ethical dimensions of GMOs by examining both the benefits and potential risks through real-world examples.

One of the main ethical debates surrounding GMOs involves their impact on the environment. Proponents argue that GMOs can reduce the need for chemical pesticides and fertilizers, thus minimizing environmental harm. For example, Bt corn, which is genetically modified to produce a natural pesticide, has significantly reduced the use of synthetic insecticides in many areas (James, 2017). Similarly, drought-tolerant crops such as certain strains of genetically modified maize have helped farmers maintain yields during periods of water scarcity (FAO, 2020).

However, critics warn of unintended ecological consequences. There is concern that GMO crops can crossbreed with wild relatives, potentially creating “superweeds” resistant to herbicides. The overuse of glyphosate-resistant crops like Roundup Ready soybeans has led to the emergence of herbicide-resistant weeds in the United States, posing challenges for farmers and ecosystems (Benbrook, 2012). Additionally, reliance on a small number of genetically engineered crops reduces biodiversity, making ecosystems more vulnerable to pests and diseases.

The safety of GMOs for human consumption is another major ethical concern. Scientific authorities, including the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and World Health Organization (WHO), have stated that GMOs currently on the market are as safe to eat as their conventional counterparts (WHO, 2022). A well-known example is Golden Rice, a genetically modified rice variety enriched with Vitamin A to combat malnutrition in countries like the Philippines and Bangladesh. Clinical trials have shown that Golden Rice can significantly improve vitamin A levels in children (Tang et al., 2012).

Despite these benefits, public skepticism remains. Critics worry about the long-term effects of consuming GMOs, particularly regarding allergenicity and antibiotic resistance. Some argue that not enough time has passed to fully understand the health impacts of GMOs, invoking the precautionary principle, which states that in cases of scientific uncertainty, caution should be prioritized (Forsberg, 2020).

An often overlooked ethical issue involves the ownership and control of GMO technologies. Most genetically modified seeds are patented by large agribusinesses like Monsanto (now Bayer), giving them significant control over seed markets. Farmers using these seeds typically must sign contracts preventing them from saving and reusing seeds, leading to increased dependency on corporations (Howard, 2015). For example, in India, many farmers adopted Bt cotton to combat pest infestations, but the high cost of patented seeds and required chemical inputs left many in debt. There have been widespread reports linking financial strain from GMO seed use to farmer suicides, though the issue is complex and involves multiple factors (Gruère & Sengupta, 2011).

GMOs can also threaten cultural and indigenous agricultural practices. For many indigenous communities, traditional crops hold cultural, spiritual, and dietary significance. The introduction of genetically modified salmon, engineered to grow faster than wild salmon, has raised concerns among indigenous groups in Canada and Alaska. These communities fear that GMO salmon could disrupt native fish populations and undermine their fishing traditions (Shepherd, 2017). The ethical principle of respect for cultural autonomy requires that indigenous voices be included in decisions about introducing GMOs that could affect their lands, practices, and identities.

GMOs are often promoted as a tool for combating global hunger by increasing crop yields and enhancing nutritional content. Golden Rice and drought-tolerant maize are prime examples of GMOs designed to address specific food security challenges in developing countries (FAO, 2020). However, the benefits of GMOs are not always equitably distributed. Intellectual property laws and high regulatory costs can limit access to these technologies for smallholder farmers in poorer regions. Critics argue that without changes to global trade and patent laws, GMOs might worsen existing inequalities rather than alleviate them (Lacey, 2016).

The ethical considerations surrounding GMOs are complex and multifaceted, involving environmental sustainability, human health, corporate power, cultural values, and global equity. While GMOs offer promising solutions to pressing global issues, their responsible development and use require careful attention to ethical principles, transparent regulation, and inclusive decision-making. Real-world examples like Bt corn, Golden Rice, and GMO salmon highlight both the opportunities and challenges posed by this technology. Moving forward, it is crucial that diverse perspectives, particularly those of marginalized communities, are considered in shaping GMO policies and practices.


References

Benbrook, C. M. (2012). Impacts of genetically engineered crops on pesticide use in the U.S. — the first sixteen years. Environmental Sciences Europe, 24(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/2190-4715-24-24

FAO. (2020). The state of food and agriculture: Moving forward on food loss and waste reduction. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. https://www.fao.org/3/ca6030en/ca6030en.pdf

Forsberg, E. M. (2020). GMOs and the precautionary principle: A critical appraisal. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 33(1), 23–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-019-09809-5

Gruère, G., & Sengupta, D. (2011). Bt cotton and farmer suicides in India: Reviewing the evidence. The Journal of Development Studies, 47(2), 316–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2010.492863

Howard, P. H. (2015). Intellectual property and consolidation in the seed industry. Crop Science, 55(6), 2489–2495. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2014.09.0669

James, C. (2017). Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2017. ISAAA Brief No. 53. ISAAA.

Lacey, H. (2016). GMOs and the interests of the least advantaged. Science and Engineering Ethics, 22(4), 1029–1046. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9683-1

Shepherd, J. (2017). The ethics of genetically modified salmon. Canadian Journal of Bioethics, 1(2), 19–27. https://doi.org/10.7202/1058673ar

Tang, G., Hu, Y., Yin, S.-A., Wang, Y., Dallal, G. E., Grusak, M. A., & Russell, R. M. (2012). Beta-carotene in Golden Rice is as good as beta-carotene in oil at providing vitamin A to children. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 96(3), 658–664. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.111.030775

WHO. (2022). Food, genetically modified. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/food-genetically-modified

Leave a Comment

Comments (4)