<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: My reflection for seminar No.2 on engaging blog posts	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://mushroom-scholars.org/my-reflection-for-seminar-no-2-on-engaging-blog-posts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://mushroom-scholars.org/my-reflection-for-seminar-no-2-on-engaging-blog-posts/</link>
	<description>Teaching &#38; Learning English</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 11:54:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: The Gator Guy		</title>
		<link>https://mushroom-scholars.org/my-reflection-for-seminar-no-2-on-engaging-blog-posts/comment-page-1/#comment-2126</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Gator Guy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 05:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://mushroom-scholars.org/?p=17949#comment-2126</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Useful reflections.
I disagree with your point about more logical steps indicating a superior analytical value. The number of steps isn&#039;t as important as the quality of each step - a sequence of basic logical steps doesn&#039;t become sophisticated on the basis of the number of steps alone. Besides, if those steps are separated form the logic supporting them as you discuss in &#039;change&#039; paragraph, it significantly reduces the impact.

After all, eating a sandwich requires many logical steps if you break it down, but that doesn&#039;t make it analytically sophisticated.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Useful reflections.<br />
I disagree with your point about more logical steps indicating a superior analytical value. The number of steps isn&#8217;t as important as the quality of each step &#8211; a sequence of basic logical steps doesn&#8217;t become sophisticated on the basis of the number of steps alone. Besides, if those steps are separated form the logic supporting them as you discuss in &#8216;change&#8217; paragraph, it significantly reduces the impact.</p>
<p>After all, eating a sandwich requires many logical steps if you break it down, but that doesn&#8217;t make it analytically sophisticated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
